| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > bind-users archives |
\On 07/26/10 23:02, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article<mailman.100.1280077153.15649.bind-users@lists.isc.org>,
> "Laws, Peter C."<plaws@ou.edu> wrote:
>
>> Understood, but what I'm asking about is that the slave does not appear to be
>> losing contact with the first-listed master. In fact, from the logs, it
>> appears to be flipping back and forth (though not round-robinning).
>
> Multiple masters is not about losing contact, it's about getting the
> most up-to-date version of the zone. There's no reason for the slave to
>
A HA! So the answer to my original question, after all this, is "Yes"
(this is expected behavior).
Thanks.
-- Peter Laws / N5UWY National Weather Center / Network Operations Center University of Oklahoma Information Technology plaws@ou.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, craigc@ou.edu. Thank you! _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users