| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > clamav-users archives |
Re: [Clamav-users] Compiler Version Configure Error
From: Clayton Keller <inetadmin_at_nospam>Date: Wed Apr 07 2010 - 20:26:34 GMT
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>
On 4/7/2010 2:35 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
> On 4/7/2010 2:33 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>> On 04/07/2010 09:34 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2010 12:30 PM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>> On 04/07/2010 08:17 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
>>>>> On 4/7/2010 11:26 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/07/2010 07:24 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/7/2010 11:12 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 04/07/2010 07:08 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I am testing out the ./configure and make on an older RedHat 7.3
>>>>>>>>> Server.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am seeing the following in the ./configure output:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> checking for supported C++ compiler version... configure:
>>>>>>>>> error: C++
>>>>>>>>> compiler too old (2.96)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are aware that 2.96 is NOT a production compiler, but a
>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>> version, right?
>>>>>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-2.96.html
>>>>>>>> "We would like to point out that GCC 2.96 is not a formal GCC
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> nor will there ever be such a release. Rather, GCC 2.96 has been
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> code- name for our development branch that will eventually
>>>>>>>> become GCC
>>>>>>>> 3.0."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oddly enough that is the compiler they shipped with this release,
>>>>>>> as far
>>>>>>> as I am aware of.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While I know this is a much out dated OS, and with that an old
>>>>>>>>> compiler,
>>>>>>>>> the source did seem to compile without error for me during the
>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there anything I may need to be aware of that could come up
>>>>>>>>> because
>>>>>>>>> of this warning and version of the compiler?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It will disable the compilation of the JIT, and you'll get an
>>>>>>>> interpreter instead for ClamAV's bytecode.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does 'make check' pass?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Test output:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SKIP: check_clamav
>>>>>>> PASS: check_freshclam.sh
>>>>>>> PASS: check_sigtool.sh
>>>>>>> SKIP: check_unit_vg.sh
>>>>>>> PASS: check1_clamscan.sh
>>>>>>> PASS: check2_clamd.sh
>>>>>>> PASS: check3_clamd.sh
>>>>>>> PASS: check4_clamd.sh
>>>>>>> SKIP: check5_clamd_vg.sh
>>>>>>> SKIP: check6_clamd_vg.sh
>>>>>>> SKIP: check7_clamd_hg.sh
>>>>>>> SKIP: check8_clamd_hg.sh
>>>>>>> ======================
>>>>>>> All 6 tests passed
>>>>>>> (6 tests were not run)
>>>>>>> ======================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't see any other errors thrown during 'make check'. All she be
>>>>>>> OK,
>>>>>>> even with the skips?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps. If you want to be sure download libcheck from here:
>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/check/files/check/0.9.8/check-0.9.8.tar.gz/download
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then reconfigure ClamAV (with --enable-check recommended), and rerun
>>>>>> make check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I receive a failure on the check_clamav test.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the output for the test in the log:
>>>>>
>>>>> FAIL: check_clamav (exit: 1)
>>>>> ============================
>>>>>
>>>>> Running suite(s): cl_api
>>>>> cli
>>>>> jsnorm
>>>>> str
>>>>> regex
>>>>> disasm
>>>>> unique
>>>>> matchers
>>>>> htmlnorm
>>>>> bytecode
>>>>> 99%: Checks: 287, Failures: 2, Errors: 0
>>>>> check_bytecode.c:107:F:arithmetic:test_inflate_jit:0: Invalid return
>>>>> value from bytecode run, expected: beef, have: dead2
>>>>>
>>>>> check_bytecode.c:107:F:arithmetic:test_inflate_int:0: Invalid return
>>>>> value from bytecode run, expected: beef, have: dead2
>>>>
>>>> This is probably due to an old version of zlib.
>>>> What does 'grep inflate unit_tests/test-stderr.log' show?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here you go:
>>>
>>> # grep inflate unit_tests/test-stderr.log
>>> LibClamAV debug: bytecode api: inflateinit2: zlib stream error!
>>> LibClamAV debug: bytecode api: inflateinit2: zlib stream error!
>>
>> You should probably upgrade zlib.
>>
>
> That's what I was thinking as well. Thanks for the assistance.
>
What could possibly occur if I installed with the current zlib version
as-is?
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml