Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92

From: jef moskot <jef_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Nov 22 2007 - 01:39:15 GMT
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>

On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Christoph Cordes wrote:
> - after a new release ClamAV should mimic the behavior of the preceding
> version by default unless it's a major release (.x0) or the user enabled
> possible new features explicitly. furthermore the default behavior
> should be as conservative as possible. Did i get this right?

I think that's reasonable, especially since I haven't seen anyone touting any specific benefit of doing things otherwise. The debate has been mostly philosophical.

Jeffrey Moskot
System Administrator
jef@math.miami.edu

Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tomasz Kojm: "Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV Vulnerability"
Previous message: Christoph Cordes: "Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV Vulnerability"
In reply to: Christoph Cordes: "Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92"
Next in thread: Mark: "Re: [Clamav-users] Phishing feature defaults, naming, and 0.92"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]