| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > clamav-users archives |
Re: [Clamav-users] Sig version not reported correctly in 0.92
From: Ugo Bellavance <ugob_at_nospam>Date: Thu Dec 20 2007 - 19:36:08 GMT
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>> [root@server~]# clamd -V
>> ClamAV 0.92/5110/Wed Dec 12 15:42:31 2007
>>
>> [root@server~]# freshclam
>> ClamAV update process started at Thu Dec 20 09:29:43 2007
>> main.cvd is up to date (version: 45, sigs: 169676, f-level: 21,
>> builder:
>> sven)
>> daily.inc is up to date (version: 5186, sigs: 9975, f-level: 21,
>> builder: aeriana)
>>
>> Is that normal?
>
> Nope...possibly you have clamd and freshclam not in agreement as to
> where the virus DB files should go, perhaps because you had an older
> version installed and still present in your path?
I don't know what happened, but it just fixed itself:
[root@server ~]# clamd -V
ClamAV 0.92/5194/Thu Dec 20 13:31:08 2007
Thanks :)
Ugo
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html