clamav-users October 2007 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > clamav-users archives
clamav-users: Re: [Clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs is dreadfully

Re: [Clamav-users] PhishingScanURLs is dreadfully slow/CPU-intensive

From: Dennis Peterson <dennispe_at_nospam>
Date: Tue Oct 30 2007 - 01:07:20 GMT
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>


John Rudd wrote:
> John Rudd wrote:
>
>> I can produce 2 examples of messages that cause the problem, in RFC822 >> format, for anyone who wants to experiment with them.
>
> I decided I'd just go ahead and make them available:
>
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318642.mbox
>
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318715.mbox

I have no problem scanning either file with Solaris 10 and clam 0.91.2 (compiled with pcre). I used clamscan and clamdscan with and without PhishingURL's enabled. No change.

clamdscan returned immediately and clamscan takes longer as expected as it has to load the db files.

dp



Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html