Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > clamav-users archives

Re: [Clamav-users] still fighting .95

From: Török Edwin <edwintorok_at_nospam>
Date: Sun Mar 29 2009 - 13:49:21 GMT
To: ClamAV users ML <clamav-users@lists.clamav.net>

On 2009-03-29 16:34, christian wrote:
> hi edwin,
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 03:13:39PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>
>> This is exactly bug #1491.
>>
>
> ok, thank you.
> anyway: i would have hoped that after trying `make check` in rc1 and rc2
> successfully, it wouldn't fail.
> if i can successfully `make check` in the last rc, but not in the release
> proper (other things being equal): what's the sense in trying to
> configure/make/make check for any rc, at all?
>

Even with the -rc the wrong libclamunrar (from 0.94.2) got loaded, but the old library "just worked" and the problem of loading the wrong library wasn't noticed.

>
>> Since these are the only 2 failures, you can run make install, and then
>> run make check again.
>>
>
> oh well - as soon as i succeed figuring out how to integrate the totally
> changed clamav-milter logic (and praying, at the same time, it won't
> change too radically come .96 or so)...
>
>
>> It should then pass all tests.
>>
>
> thank you! :-)
>
>
>> Well you could have used something like pastebin, but nevermind.
>>
>
> omg - something out of the irc world, i guess?
> i wouldn't know where to find such animal - certainly not on my machine
> (slack 12.1)!
>

By pastebin I mean services like paste.debian.net, or pastebin.com, where you can paste
your output, and then only send a link to it.

Best regards,
--Edwin

---

Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml