Re: Option 82 & limit lease 1

From: David W. Hankins <dhankins_at_nospam>
Date: Wed Mar 10 2010 - 00:45:30 GMT
To: Users of ISC DHCP <dhcp-users@lists.isc.org>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:12:10PM -0500, Terry Shipclark wrote:
> > If you don't require to maintain state on the assigned leases, the
> > best thing, as was suggested, is the new host record "option matching"
> > semantic in 4.2.0.
>
> Now as I am new to the list I am not sure when this version is proposed to
> be stable, however I believe this is exactly the type of functionality I am
> looking to implement, as we will be limiting mac learning on the layer 2
> switch to 1, and not allowing anything questionable.

I haven't gotten a lot of feedback one way or the other on 4.2, but
then we usually only hear when things go terribly wrong. Silence is
usually a pretty good sign, so I'm pretty confident saying the code is
reaching beta quality.

-- David W. Hankins BIND 10 needs more DHCP voices. Software Engineer There just aren't enough in our heads. Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. http://bind10.isc.org/

_______________________________________________
dhcp-users mailing list
dhcp-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David W. Hankins: "Re: how to send Leasequery Message"
Previous message: Glenn Satchell: "Re: howto change range in ha-setup?"
In reply to: Terry Shipclark: "Option 82 & limit lease 1"
Next in thread: Marc Perea: "Re: Option 82 & limit lease 1"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]