| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > engarde-users archives |
Me to should I think about upgrading to the newer ver. and is it time
bombed like all the windozes stuff?
Big AL
> A hearty second to that!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Randy
>
> PS - I have been running the same server on version 1.0.1 without a hitch
> since shortly after that version was released, it is a great product. :)
>
> http://www.frenzy.org
> "Sed Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?" -Juvenal
>
> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for the use of
the intended
> recipient only and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged or legally
> protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this communication is
strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
immediately notify
> the sender by return e-mail message and delete all copies of the original
communication.
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Sam Morgan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:48:38 +0000
> Sam Morgan <peacemkr@wcc.net> wrote:
>
> > Any particular reason why legacy EnGarde 1.0.1 advisories
> > < http://infocenter.guardiandigital.com/advisories/legacy/1.0.1 >
> > has been abandonded?
> snip
>
> As I was willing to gripe <g>
> Let me also be willing to thank you for getting the patches that applied
to
> the older 1.0.1 version posted on the /advisories/legacy/1.0.1 web pages.
> Sure makes life ezier for those of us that still run it.
>
> Again, thanks for fixing my percieved problem.
>
> God Bless,
> Sam Morgan
> --
> "linux -- the lifetime learning experience"
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe email engarde-users-request@engardelinux.org
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe email engarde-users-request@engardelinux.org
> with "unsubscribe" in the subject of the message.
>
>