init_script_type versus init_script_file

From: David Carter <dcarter_at_nospam>
Date: Sun Oct 26 2008 - 15:01:28 GMT
To: fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com

Good morning.

I'm trying to build a module package but I'm running into issues with these macros. When I build in my FC9 development environment, I require init_script_file. When I use mock, it will only build using init_script_type. Why the difference, and what do I do about it?

While I might expect issues across versions, I don't expect a difference when my mock target and my build environment are the same.

Also, if FC10 is different from FC9, how do I handle that?

TIA
- Dave -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: How can I find out what all the SELinux transactions are?"
Previous message: Gene Heskett: "logrotate problems, again."
Next in thread: Daniel J Walsh: "Re: init_script_type versus init_script_file"
Reply: Daniel J Walsh: "Re: init_script_type versus init_script_file"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]