|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > fedora-selinux archives|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 12/28/2010 12:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 12/26/2010 05:25 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
>> On Sunday, December 26, 2010 05:25:22 pm Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> is trying to read the state files in /proc for some unconfined_t process
>> Never thought of /proc. That explains why I found it weird to see a file
>> labeled as unconfined_t.
>> Frank: disregard my previous suggetion >:)
>> selinux mailing list
> What OS/Version are you seeing this in?
dwalsh: looks like fedoras' passenger policy only works for passenger 2.*
recently it seems version 3.* was released which introduced some major
changes, causing fedora policy for passenger to completely break.
i started work on a version 3 compatible policy but it is not advancing
Also to miroslav: i noticed you have designed current policy for
passenger with /var/lib/passenger as the webapp document root. I am of
the opinion however that passenger/ror webapps should be labelled
https_sys/user/*_script_exec_t just like any other webapp.
selinux mailing list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- selinux mailing list email@example.com https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux