fedora-selinux February 2008 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > fedora-selinux archives
fedora-selinux: Re: periodic policy audits

Re: periodic policy audits

From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh_at_nospam>
Date: Fri Feb 22 2008 - 13:44:43 GMT
To: Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Again, looking through the policy I see sections for policy
> to confine cardmgr, /etc/hotplug scripts, updfstab, etc. Do
> we do any routine policy updates to purge obsolete policy?
>
> If not, should we?
>
> Bill
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
The problem is we are using the same upstream policy for RHEL4/RHEL5/Fedora7-9/Debian/Gentoo/Ubunto/...

So while one distribution may not use it, others might. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAke+0csACgkQrlYvE4MpobMimgCfQp37B8OwRRn0jLJ7/Vu8//PU 9/gAnj6ZFwSl9JR5V7PiMoWGcMp9c4HN
=hBUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-selinux-list mailing list fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list