|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > fedora-users archives|
On 10/11/2011 02:17 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:09:29 -0500 Christoph Wickert
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 11.10.2011, 19:25 +0800 schrieb Ed Greshko:
>>> I frankly (no pun intended) don't think "Beefy Miracle" is a name to be
>>> proud of.
>> I do. Even though I am vegetarian.
> My problem with the name is that it conveys two different things, none
> of which I want in my linux distribution.
> The term "Beefy" does not chime with a lean and efficient distribution.
Lean? Fedora? Shome mishtake shurely.
> The term "Miracle" is something that is even worse. It is some
> phenomenon that can not be explained (except by divinity). Do we really
> want that in a linux distribution?
I think that "miracle" is more often used as a metaphor. As a
description of free (as in gratis) software that's better than
software you have to pay for, "miracle" isn't entirely inappropriate.
-- users mailing list email@example.com To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines