|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > fedora-users archives|
On 10/16/2011 01:56 PM, agraham wrote:
> The real problem here is the designers of the concept lost sight of the
> actual benefit to the user, the problem as I would state is:
> "Provide a means that allows consistent naming of network devices".
> That should have translated into eth0 is "ALWAYS" the first device, eth1
> is "ALWAYS" the second device etc.. the biosdevname should have then
> been used to create that relationship and _nothing else_.
Do read the feature description and related discussions. It's not like
you are the first person to think of this.
-- users mailing list email@example.com To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines