fedora-users October 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > fedora-users archives
fedora-users: Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate

Re: fail2ban vs. logrotate

From: Andre Speelmans <fedora-list_at_nospam>
Date: Tue Oct 25 2011 - 05:23:04 GMT
To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>

> It sounds like fail2ban still has the old log file open. You need to
> have logrotate tell fail2ban that the log file has changed.

Change the config file for logrotate so that it does not create a new
file, but that it uses copy-and-truncate. The exact syntax is easily
found in the man-page.

> Logrotate already does this will other services when it rotates
> their log file. I am surprised the .rpm did not include the files
> for logrotate to automatically sent the proper signal to fail2ban.

/var/log/secure is not a daemon specific file, but a general log-file
and as such does not have a (daemon-) specific rpm. And a general file
can't send signals to all kinds of daemons that may, or may not run on
a system.
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines