full-disclosure-uk May 2007 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > full-disclosure-uk archives
full-disclosure-uk: Re: [Full-disclosure] What RedHat doesn't wa

Re: [Full-disclosure] What RedHat doesn't want you to know about ExecShield (without NX)

From: h4h <aza_at_nospam>
Date: Mon May 14 2007 - 21:28:13 GMT
To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, dailydave@lists.immunitysec.com

On 5/14/07, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:13:19 EDT, Brad Spengler said:
> > Ingo knows about this (I mailed him privately about the problems I saw
> > with Fedora Core 3, which resulted in an updated kernel -- though I
> Dude, Fedora Core 3 was like 2 frikking years ago. I suppose it's OK
> for us to diss the grsecurity patch today because there were bugs in 2.1.5
> ?
> (I have a grsecurity-2.1.5- hanging around
> which dates back to just about the same time as FC3 was released).
> Now if you want to discuss the execshield implementation that's currently
> shipping in FC6 or the about-to-escape FC7, we'll be more than happy to
> listen.

Is that really the only thing you could find in spenders post to complain about, Valdis? Are the rest of his points therefor moot? lol.

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/