Re: [Ipsec] Are people implementing IPcomp with IPsec?

From: Paul Koning <pkoning_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Aug 09 2007 - 18:34:49 GMT
To: charliek@exchange.microsoft.com

>>>>> "Charlie" == Charlie Kaufman <charliek@exchange.microsoft.com> writes:
Charlie> And if so, which compression algorithm are they most often Charlie> using? I believe the Microsoft implementation currently Charlie> does not support compression (though I'd be happy to hear Charlie> someone contradict me on that). In lobbying to change that, Charlie> it would be helpful to know whether any third party Charlie> interoperability would be gained.

In an earlier life I built a product that did the combination, using LZW. These days, I would like to see IPsec + IPcomp. Given intellectual property issues, Deflate is an attractive algorithm. It can be done in software, of course; I don't know if there are hardware-accelerated implementations of Deflate around.

paul

Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Arnaud EBALARD: "Re: [Ipsec] NULL/NULL forbidden in ESP"
Previous message: Charlie Kaufman: "[Ipsec] Are people implementing IPcomp with IPsec?"
In reply to: Charlie Kaufman: "[Ipsec] Are people implementing IPcomp with IPsec?"
Next in thread: Thor Lancelot Simon: "Re: [Ipsec] Are people implementing IPcomp with IPsec?"
Reply: Thor Lancelot Simon: "Re: [Ipsec] Are people implementing IPcomp with IPsec?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]