Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format

From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen_at_nospam>
Date: Fri Feb 06 2009 - 11:15:32 GMT
To: "Grewal, Ken" <ken.grewal@intel.com>

Grewal, Ken writes:
> If there are alternatives that would allow operation over 'well
> known' ports such as 80, then those would be preferable.

As most of those voice systems do use UDP, even using well known port 80 does not help as it is only open for TCP traffic. Running voice over tcp gets quite poor results, especially if your connection might drop few packets. -- kivinen@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tero Kivinen: "Re: [IPsec] draft-kivinen-ipsecme-esp-null-heuristics comments"
Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format"
In reply to: Grewal, Ken: "Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format"
Next in thread: Jean-Michel Combes: "Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format"
Reply: Jean-Michel Combes: "Re: [IPsec] Feedback on the interim session's format"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]