Re: ïÔ×ÅÔ: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?

From: Igor Zhbanov <izh1979_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Mar 16 2009 - 23:17:20 GMT
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>

Anyway, please commit changes to linux-2.4 too.

fs/nfsd/auth.c for CAP_NFSD_MASK:
#define CAP_NFSD_MASK (CAP_FS_MASK|CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))

and

include/linux/capability.h for CAP_FS_MASK:
#define CAP_FS_MASK 0x1f
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: ÐžÑ‚Ð²ÐµÑ‚: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?"
Previous message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: ÐžÑ‚Ð²ÐµÑ‚: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?"
In reply to: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: ÐžÑ‚Ð²ÐµÑ‚: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: ÐžÑ‚Ð²ÐµÑ‚: VFS, NFS security bug? Should CAP_MKNOD and CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE be added to CAP_FS_MASK?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]