metasploit-framework July 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > metasploit-framework archives
metasploit-framework: Re: [framework] New Javascript Packer: JSi

Re: [framework] New Javascript Packer: JSidle

From: Spring Systems <korund_at_nospam>
Date: Tue Jul 13 2010 - 11:11:54 GMT
To: <>, <>


Just played with custom encoded adobe_flashplayer_newfunction PDF exploit, and find that Kaspersky AV dont allow specific operation with SWF file which included in exploit (seems don't allow write operation), I still can open PDF file, KAV does not delete file and doesn't flag it as virus.
Is it possible to encode SWF itself?


> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:30:14 +0200
> From:
> To:
> CC:
> Subject: Re: [framework] New Javascript Packer: JSidle
> Thanks for testing. I think it is very difficult to permanently
> circumvent the detection of malicious javascript in PDF files. In
> contrast to web-based exploits, AV can flag the usage of JS obfuscation
> as malicious, though it does not see the real exploit (therefore the
> "generic" detection).
> In the first development phase I only targeted web-based exploits - the
> usage for PDFs was more of a side product.
> - Sven
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 10:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
> Miguel Rios <> wrote:
>> Well, just thought I'd share my results with NOD after applying the
>> jsidle patch for new icon adobe exploit. Bottom line, NOD still flags
>> it as PDF/Exploit.Gen. Tried encrypting it also and it did cut down
>> on detections but NOD still flags it as PDF/Exploit.Gen. Seems NOD is
>> doing a pretty good job in flagging malicious PDFs.
>> --- On Sat, 7/10/10, Jonathan R <> wrote:
>> From: Jonathan R <>
>> Subject: Re: [framework] New Javascript Packer: JSidle
>> To: "Miguel Rios" <>,
>> Date: Saturday, July 10, 2010, 11:15 PM
>> NOD prides themselves on having one of the best heuristics engines, so
>> I believe NOD would mark the PDF as suspicious and not a specific
>> threat. You can do what many malware writers do and split the PDF into
>> multiple parts and you can narrow the range of where/what in the PDF
>> is getting flagged. Then change things accordingly.
>> This idea of delaying code to bypass detection has been brought up
>> before by well known virus writers like Z0mbie and Second Part To
>> Hell/[rRlf].
>><--- Z0mbie's Paper
>><--- SPTH/rHlf
>> This is all based upon the fact that a anti virus like Norton or NOD
>> can only spend about 3 or 4 seconds on each file. Otherwise a AV scan
>> would take to long.
> _______________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.