Re: RBL Spam question

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 09:11:39AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Henrik K put forth on 11/5/2010 2:49 AM:
>
> > Did you happen to notice the absolutely generic expressions in the SA file,
> > unlike your file which mostly lists specific domains?
>
> The bulk of them are specific to a given ISP. I saw a half dozen that
> are generic.

And the generic ones probably match the bulk of your rules. Your "1600
rules" comparison didn't make any sense.

Of course you are free to file a SA bug/feature or even become a committer
yourself so you can mass check the rules. But it's beyond this list.

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Noel Jones: "Re: Accepting / Rejecting mails"
• Previous message: Stan Hoeppner: "Re: serious bug with check_client_access"
• In reply to: Stan Hoeppner: "Re: RBL Spam question"
• Next in thread: JunkYardMail1_at_nospam: "Re: RBL Spam question"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]