Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning

Wietse Venema:
> Wietse Venema:
> > > >> Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need
> > > >> changing?
> > > > #11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent
> > > > parameter.
> > > >
> > > > Wietse
> > > >
> > > yes sir, #2 does exist in my case...
> >
> > Why don't you show the real evidence, instead of your anonymized version.
>
> Well, I tested this at some point. I'll see what change has broken it.

Found it. The code works for "unix"-based spawn services. I'll add a
line for "inet"-based ones.

        Wietse

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Noel Jones: "Re: Increasing number of connections?"
• Previous message: Hari Hendaryanto: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"
• Next in thread: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"
• Reply: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]