Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning

On 11/17/2011 8:06 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
>> Wietse Venema:
>>> Wietse Venema:
>>>>>>> Note #11. Does this mean this is still valid, or that the docs need
>>>>>>> changing?
>>>>>> #11 is valid ONLY IF #2 exists. Without #2 it is a non-existent
>>>>>> parameter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wietse
>>>>>>
>>>>> yes sir, #2 does exist in my case...
>>>> Why don't you show the real evidence, instead of your anonymized version.
>>> Well, I tested this at some point. I'll see what change has broken it.
>> Found it. The code works for "unix"-based spawn services. I'll add a
>> line for "inet"-based ones.
> Fix: delete this test from postconf.c:
>
> /*
> * Skip all endpoints except UNIX-domain sockets.
> */
> if (strcmp(argv->argv[1], MASTER_XPORT_NAME_UNIX) != 0)
> continue;
>
> Fixed by removing code!
>
> Wietse
>
i've recompiled, it works now :)

thanks for the efforts

Powered By http://www.3g-net.net

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Dan The Man: "spamcop abusing mail systems worldwide"
• Previous message: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"
• In reply to: Wietse Venema: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"
• Next in thread: Hari Hendaryanto: "Re: Postfix 2.9 Snapshot 20111113 warning"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]