|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > postfix-users archives|
I'm now trying to move all RBL and RHSBL checks to policyd-weight. In
policyd-weight I set "$ADD_X_HEADER = 1" and very high score so it never
Then I plan to parse "X-policyd-weight" header with sieve script on
cyrus to move spam to separate imap folder. Header looks like this:
X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate: -6.6
If somebody tried this or have better solution please share your
В Вто, 26/10/2010 в 14:11 +0300, Покотиленко Костик пишет:
> I have the following postfix configuration:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/recipients_access,
> check_client_access cidr:/etc/postfix/access_noauth,
> check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_whitelist,
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/rbl_sender_whitelist,
> reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
> reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rbl_client spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
> reject_rbl_client recent.spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/rhsbl_sender_domain_whitelist,
> reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org,
> reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org,
> reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org,
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access,
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/maps/verify_domain
> which is working fine but...
> sorbs.net is very agressive, many ISPs get blocked for several years and
> are not willing to delist b/c sorbs doesn't offer free delist for them.
> So there is problem with false-positives. There are not much of them,
> but all cases needs additional investigation.
> >From other side this combination (spamhaus.org + sorbs.net) doesn't pass
> spam almost at all, they even doesn't leave anything for spamassassin,
> so I don't want to remove checks.
> So the question is: how it is possible to direct SPAM mail to a user's
> imap spam folder?
> Postfix works with cyrus by lmtp. I googled alot for this question and
> the only way of doing this I was able to find is to use procmail +
> If there is a way to set specific header instead of rejecting mail it
> would be easy to move tagged mail to spam folder by SEIVE filters. This
> would be prefered variant.
-- Покотиленко Костик <firstname.lastname@example.org>