| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > postfix-users archives |
Re: PROPOSED PATCH. Please test (was: Odd postfix LDAP behavior)
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah_at_nospam>Date: Fri Oct 28 2011 - 02:22:05 GMT
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
--On October 28, 2011 2:18:22 AM +0000 Viktor Dukhovni
<postfix-users@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 05:55:21PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>
>> The original response from Viktor had:
>>
>> Naturally also post the Postfix table definition, which will indicate
>> whether you're using simple or SASL binds. If possible try both,
>> and report any difference in behaviour, since as you know the SASL
>> bind code is relatively new, perhaps there are subtleties in the
>> LDAP API that were not taken into account, but I prefer to not
>> speculate on the likelihood of such an issue with no usable
>> information.
>
> I thought I also pointed out that the issue goes back to Postfix
> 2.3 or later with OpenLDAP 2.4 or later. However, nothing older
> than 2.5 is supported, and I don't believe that this rises to a
> level of criticality that requires re-opening the 2.4 and older
> releases.
The issue I fixed today would affect any postfix build with an OpenLDAP API
at least as far back as OpenLDAP 2.1. What postfix revisions you fix are
entirely up to you of course, and I think reasonably I wouldn't expect you
to fix unsupported postfix releases, but it is not limited to the OpenLDAP
2.4 API.
--Quanah
-- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration