|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > selinux archives|
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 10:07 -0500, James Carter wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 09:30 -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 18:25 -0500, Caleb Case wrote:
> > > This patch moves the final files from inside
> > > /var/lib/selinux/<store>/[active|previous|tmp] to
> > > /var/lib/selinux/tmp/<store>. The move is done to facilitate using
> > > source control management on the /var/lib/selinux/<store> directory. If
> > > these files remain in /var/lib/selinux/<store> they will pose a size
> > > problem if an SCM like git is used as we'd be storing lots of binary
> > > diffs. We are suggesting making this change now, rather than later when
> > > source policy, SCM, and CIL support are available, to ease the
> > > migration burden.
> > >
> > > These are the files that have been moved:
> > >
> > > /var/lib/selinux/<store>/active/... /var/lib/selinux/tmp/<store>/...
> > >
> > > file_contexts contexts/files/file_contexts
> > > file_contexts.homedirs contexts/files/file_contexts.homedirs
> > > file_contexts.local contexts/files/file_contexts.local
> > > netfilter_contexts contexts/netfilter_contexts
> > > policy.kern policy/policy.<policyversion>
> > > seusers.final seusers
> > >
> > > The layout of these files in /var/lib/selinux/tmp/<store> is designed to
> > > mirror their locations in /etc/selinux/<store>. This should help clarify
> > > the relationship between these final files and the files installed in
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > One consequence of this move is that reverting to the previous policy
> > > version requires a policy rebuild. Currently you can revert without
> > > rebuilding.
> > That seems a little worrisome to me, as a rebuild might fail, e.g. what
> > happens if we abort a transaction due to a lack of disk space and then
> > try to revert, requiring a rebuild, only to run out of space during the
> > rebuild?
> If the transaction is aborted then the policy hasn't actually been
> changed, so I don't think that this example would be a problem. It is
> only after the transaction is complete that everything is written to the
> final location. Or am I missing something?
> It would be a problem only if changes were made to the policy, that
> policy loaded, there were problems, and then the rebuild of the previous
> policy fails.
I'm unclear on what state things would be left in. I'm also unclear on the implications of writing these files to a single tmp/ location rather than having separate copies in active/, previous/, and tmp/ - I don't want us to unwittingly clobber files or leave them in intermediate states (as happened with the earlier attempt to hard link files among active/, previous/ and tmp/).
I tried running the code but I seem to see these "final files" still under the individual <store> directories in /var/lib/selinux rather than under tmp/. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.