| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > selinux archives |
Re: concept of a permissive domain
From: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan_at_nospam>Date: Tue Sep 11 2007 - 21:26:27 GMT
To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:31 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
[...]
> One other feature/requirement would be to not override dontaudit rules.
> So if I have a domain in permissive mode and I have a dontaudit rule on
> reading /etc/shadow. The app should still be denied reading
> /etc/shadow. (This is not a show stopper, but would allow us to force
> apps to take the code paths they will take in enforcing mode.)
This isn't specific to per-domain permissive, right? It would be useful in general for permissive.
Karl -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.