|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > selinux archives|
On Monday 03 December 2007 2:41:07 pm Todd C. Miller wrote:
> > Stephen Smalley wrote:
> > Looks like the libsepol patch puts the policycaps ebitmap at a different
> > location in the policy image than the kernel patch expects.
> I had initially changed the ebitmap reading/writing location from
> where Josh had it to work around an issue with semodule. This version
> preserves the location in the final policy binary without confusing
Okay, well that at least loaded my simple test policy but it didn't appear to have any effect on /selinux/policy_capabilities/network_peer_controls. This may be a problem with the kernel patch but before I started digging around I thought I would first check with you on the correct policy syntax.
I'm using a Rawhide targeted policy and I'm loading a simple policy module with the following statements:
It compiles (using /usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile) and loads (semodule -i peer_test.pp) but I'm not certain I haven't messed something up. Thoughts? -- paul moore linux security @ hp -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.