| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > shorewall-users archives |
Re: [Shorewall-users] hfsc question
From: Tom Eastep <teastep_at_nospam>Date: Wed May 11 2011 - 15:33:21 GMT
To: shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
On 05/11/2011 07:46 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>
>> I don't know. I guess that you will have to experiment and see. Please
>> let us know what you learn, so I can update the Complex TC doc with your
>> findings.
>>
> I think I figured it out - the tricky part was to determine the excesses
> and the additional delay I have to split between the two remaining
> classes - 16 & 17. So, here is what I think the final figures should be:
>
...
> Does the above makes sense? How do I actually "test" whether these
> calculations are correct?
The calculations make sense. I think my first attempt to test this would
be to run parallel netperfs (one netperf per class) and look at the
output of 'shorewall show tc'. That will show you what the actual speeds
are. I don't recall if netperf provides any latency data.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users