| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives |
RuleQA noise Re: [Bug 6534] Evaluate UCEPROTECT
From: <Darxus_at_nospam>Date: Tue Mar 01 2011 - 20:13:02 GMT
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
On 03/01, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> I haven't spent any time over the years reading ruleqa results, but
> is it normal for a rule's S/O to bounce all over the place from week
> to week, or is that an indication of a problem in the testing
RuleQA results are incredibly noisy:
http://www.chaosreigns.com/dnswl/
(I recommend firefox due to inconsistent implementations of svg rendering.)
The last two graphs on that page are most relevant - spam and ham counts,
and percentage of corpora which is ham. The data is only the weekly -net
runs.
I've been meaning to look into this to see if it correlates to some people
submitting their data inconsistently or something.
-- "I don't want people who want to dance, I want people who have to dance." --George Balanchine http://www.ChaosReigns.com