Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?

From: <darxus_at_nospam>
Date: Sat Apr 02 2011 - 08:48:20 GMT
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org

On 04/01, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
> My only comment on this is rather with the "Maintained" date.
> Maintained means little if the plugin hasn't been updated for years
> but continues to work with modern spamassassin versions. How about
> "Maintained <DATE> tested with spamassassin-3.3.1"?

That would, of course, be ideal. If somebody could be conned into doing
the testing :)

-- "You may be recognized soon. Hide." http://www.ChaosReigns.com

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla-daemon_at_nospam: "[Bug 6566] New: X-Ham-Report default wording ("has identified this incoming email as possible spam") is confusing and inaccurate"
Previous message: Warren Togami Jr.: "Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?"
In reply to: Warren Togami Jr.: "Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?"
Next in thread: Warren Togami Jr.: "Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?"
Reply: Warren Togami Jr.: "Re: Wombat plugin - dumb or intentional?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]