|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-dev archives|
> On 2011-09-13 22:23, email@example.com wrote:
> > We waste so much time backporting to the last branch. And trunk has been
> > incredibly stable. I hate to see releases that aren't taken from trunk,
> > seems like a waste of time and effort.
> for once I agree with Darxus :)
> There are a few usefull additions/fixes in 3.4 trunk which won't ever
> get backported and it would be a pity to have to wait
Yes, no need to waste effort on 3.3.3, there are no critical problems
> I'd +1 to cut a "beta1" out of trunk.
> I'd like to make a goal to get sa-update a lot cleaner and ipv6 native
> release which I'm working on infrastructure for and call it 3.4.x.
I agree, fixing the sa-update's problem of repeated downloads when
some intermediate stage fails should be considered a blocker for 3.4.0.
Making sa-update IPv6 capable would be highly desirable, now that Kevin
has provided a dual-stack mirror (thanks Kevin!). A major release
is a good opportunity for both of these changes.
I still need to fix one issue with AskDNS plugin...