spamassassin-dev April 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header defau

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

From: <darxus_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Apr 21 2011 - 17:36:16 GMT
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org

I meant to link to the relevant docs:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_SPF

On 04/21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> this header could be removed in mta, and readded if spf pass in mta, its
> just not any stable milters that does it so far, but if headers is removed
> and added it most likely invalidates dkim if remote signed it

"By default, when using Received-SPF headers, the plugin will attempt to
use the oldest (bottom most) Received-SPF headers, that were added by
internal relays..."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ohh, sounds like it might ignore anything added before an internal relay,
so the current default is fine?

Also, postfix can add this Received-SPF header with
https://launchpad.net/postfix-policyd-spf-perl/

-- "It's never too late to panic." http://www.ChaosReigns.com