spamassassin-dev April 2011 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-dev archives
spamassassin-dev: Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header defau

Re: Shouldn't ignore_received_spf_header default to 1?

From: <darxus_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Apr 21 2011 - 17:36:16 GMT

I meant to link to the relevant docs:

On 04/21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> this header could be removed in mta, and readded if spf pass in mta, its
> just not any stable milters that does it so far, but if headers is removed
> and added it most likely invalidates dkim if remote signed it

"By default, when using Received-SPF headers, the plugin will attempt to
use the oldest (bottom most) Received-SPF headers, that were added by
internal relays..."

Ohh, sounds like it might ignore anything added before an internal relay,
so the current default is fine?

Also, postfix can add this Received-SPF header with

-- "It's never too late to panic."