|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
> Getting a bunch of these, and I'm getting very low scores, using the
> latest spamassassin rules, and the most common third-party rulesets.
> Also using spamhaus, investment and other DNSBLs, but my users seem to
> be getting these before the urls are making their way into those
> The subject is about various types of pills, and I do note that the
> Subject line header is often in mixed case - not just the subject
> itself, but even the word "subject" - it might be "SubjeCT" or
> "subjeCT" or "SUBJect", but I don't see a rule for anything like this.
> There's almost always a link and then a bit of random text.
> Here are three examples:
+1 for these. I've seen a ton of these, and the only protection I have
is a local URIBL I've built for the many new domains that haven't yet
been added to the public URIBLs.
Yours don't have any spamassassin/amavisd headers. How are you processing these?
They typically also only BAYES_50 for me.