|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
> On 07.10.10 13:28, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> > I see what you mean, but, well, I personally would vote "no" to this.
> > I'm really tired of all that mailing lists which can't stay from
> > attaching their own banners and general hints at the message tail.
I fully agree.
> not mentioning breakage of e.g. DKIM.
> btw, not to be off-topic at least once, can SA comply with this?
Not breaking DKIM signature? Yes, on both accounts:
- the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list does not break signatures
(thankfully it does not modify Subject or add footers/signatures);
- DKIM signatures in messages passed through SpamAssassin are normally
not invalidated, unless one configures SA to modify Subject or to add
a report to the body of a message.