spamassassin-users October 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: [Meta] Unsubscribe / help footer at the

Re: [Meta] Unsubscribe / help footer at the bottom of messages to this list.

From: Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Oct 07 2010 - 21:41:40 GMT
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org

On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > It's not a matter of missing "information" forced onto each and any
> > post. Ultimately, it boils down to the subscribers' clue level, in
> > particular understanding email and mailing lists.
>
> I was going to suggest the footer should read:
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list see the list-unsubscribe: header

Well, this still would be an intrusive disclaimer. And *really* not
necessary with this list and its audience, as history shows.

With other lists populated by non tech-savvy folks, it won't work
either. You lost your audience by referring to a "header". You would not
assume people unable to comprehend a verbose "how to unsub" disclaimer,
and still manage to send it straight to the list, to grok that, would
you?

Yes, I have seen helpful replies along the lines of "the next paragraph
tells you how to unsub". The full sender's text. The next paragraph
would be the list-added disclaimer -- of course, also part of the OP's
unsub request in the first place.

But I believe we already crossed the line from "meta" to OT. ;) This
braindead message munging won't happen on this list.

-- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}