|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 15:58 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> corpus.defero wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 20:13 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> corpus.defero wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:56 -1000, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
> >> >> Indeed no IP should be blacklisted undefinitely... at least
> >> >> without checking regularily.
> >> > I don't agree. An IP that hops on and off lists should stay ON
> >> > until the blocklist operator is satisfied that no further abuse
> >> > will come from it.
> >> How does that differ from what Alexandre said?
> > It differs because I am saying they *should* remain listed forever.
> Actually, as far as I can tell, you said "until the blocklist operator
> is satisfied that no further abuse will come from it" which is clearly
> not "forever".
No, in my clarification I have been precise and clear and said:
"I am saying they *should* remain listed forever"
Really, I cannot be any more exact than that.
This is all OT for a Spamassassin. If you want to bitch about blocklists
why not do it on SPAM-L or at NANAE?