spamassassin-users June 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: Rule overlap

Re: Rule overlap

From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Jun 10 2010 - 09:45:05 GMT
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org

On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>
> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>
> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combined?

I think I found some another:

RDNS_DYNAMIC versus FH_HOST_EQ_* rules (FH_HOST_EQ_DYNAMICIP,
FH_HOST_EQ_PACBELL_D, FH_HOST_EQ_VERIZON_P and FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA)

-- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar_at_fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. How does cat play with mouse? cat /dev/mouse