|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
Ned Slider wrote:
> On 06/10/2010 10:45 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 09.06.10 10:10, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>> I was looking at the hits on a drug spam and I noticed these two:
>>> * 1.1 NO_PRESCRIPTION BODY: No prescription needed
>>> * 1.5 FB_NO_SCRIP_NEEDED BODY: Phrase: no prescription needed.
>>> The rules themselves are very similar. Should these two be combined?
>> I think I found some another:
>> RDNS_DYNAMIC versus FH_HOST_EQ_* rules (FH_HOST_EQ_DYNAMICIP,
>> FH_HOST_EQ_PACBELL_D, FH_HOST_EQ_VERIZON_P and FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA)
> Found a similar one myself last week. Filed a bug and it was fixed
> very quickly in the next rule update:
> So do file a bug report :)
Filed a bug for the prescription rules: