spamassassin-users October 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: Seeking advice re: SA score discrepancie

Re: Seeking advice re: SA score discrepancies

From: René Berber <r.berber_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Oct 18 2010 - 00:36:40 GMT

On 10/17/2010 7:05 PM, Jerry Pape wrote:

> x-spam-status reads: No, score=3.8 required=4.0
> autolearn=no version=3.2.5
> Assessment of this header at
> yields:
> Test Score Description
> BAYES_40 0.000 Bayesian spam probability is 20 to 40%
> HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02 0.550 HTML has a low ratio of text to image area
> HTML_MESSAGE 0.001 HTML included in message
> HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 1.052 HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
> MIME_HTML_ONLY 1.672 Message only has text/html MIME parts
> RDNS_NONE 0.100 Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
> URIBL_BLACK 1.961 Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
> Total:
> 5.336
> Clearly 5.336 does not equal 3.8.

There are several possible causes of the discrepancy:

* You are running an old version, the site you used probably is using
the latest, 3.3.1 (with the latest rule sets).

* The scores come from the rule sets, which are updated periodically...
do you use sa-update?

* You could have changed scores locally, but you said you are using
defaults, so I only mention it for reference.
-- René Berber