spamassassin-users October 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: Verification that Network Mass-Checks us

Re: Verification that Network Mass-Checks use correct trusted_networks ?

From: Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Oct 18 2010 - 03:16:43 GMT

On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 22:18 -0400, wrote:
> > > Could it be verified that the corpora being submitted for the weekly
> > > Network Mass-Checks are coming from systems with correctly configured
> > > trusted_networks and internal_networks? [...]

> [...] I'm asking that each of the submitters
> verify their configurations.

Ahem. Let us do this the other way round. *Why* do you believe this is
warranted, *why* do you believe our mass-check contributors might have
their internal and trusted networks set up incorrectly? This is crucial.

Mass-check contributors are handpicked. We do *not* accept any result,
unless we believe we can trust the contributor.

Posting privileges to this list only requires a confirmed sign-up by the
sender, though, so the barrier is significantly lower. Get why I ask for
more facts to back up your request? What exactly is your point anyway?

-- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}