spamassassin-users October 2010 archive
Main Archive Page > Month Archives  > spamassassin-users archives
spamassassin-users: Re: Latest Version Query

Re: Latest Version Query

From: Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther_at_nospam>
Date: Thu Oct 21 2010 - 21:19:18 GMT

On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:01 -0500, Clayton Keller wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 3:43 PM, John Hardin wrote:

> > > Is there an available/preferred method to query for the most recent
> > > released version of SpamAssassin?
> > >
> > > I know there exists TXT records to for each version to maintain
> > > sa-update based rules (i.e. But does
> > > something exist to query and indicate that the current version is, for
> > > example 3.3.1?

> > As an update package is released with each base code release, you can
> > iterate the TXT records until you get no response. If you already have
> > SA installed and you want to see if a newer version is available, that's
> > three queries: current.current.current+1, current.current+1.0, and
> > current+1.0.0

Unfortunately, not *that* easy. I am not entirely sure about the exact
details, but -- the respective next version also is available,
corresponding to running off of the SVN branch.

  $ host -t TXT descriptive text "1004932"

Same for 3.4.0, FWIW. The problem now is the exact timing. Or lack
thereof, which was not an issue with previous releases but became an
issue since 3.3.0 -- which split out rules from code in a separate
tarball. I believe to recall that setting up the 3.4.0 channel took a
while, so the above method would have failed to alert you about the
availability of 3.3.0.

What *does* work, however, is subscribing to the announce list. This
would reliably and timely notify you of a new release.

> That's kind of the direction I was beginning to go myself with what's
> available at the present time.
> Would there be interest in adding a TXT record which would respond with
> the most current version, the most current sa-update response for that
> version, etc.? I was thinking of something similar to ClamAV's
> TXT entry.

What would be wrong about the announce list?

I don't assume you will have that script do an unattended upgrade, would
you? Not a wise idea, in case some more fundamental things change like
with 3.3.

So the script would notify you by mail? What would be the difference to
the announce list?

-- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}