|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives|
On 24/10/2010 9:27 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 18:03 -0230, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
>> On 24/10/2010 5:44 PM, Karsten BrÃ¤ckelmann wrote:
>>> There are perfectly valid reasons to not have the actual recipient in
>>> the To header. Ever sent a message with Bcc recipients? Ever received a
>>> post via a mailing list?
>> I had not thought of that, but you are right :) I see this mailing list
>> sets the To: header to email@example.com, even though the
>> e-mail comes to me.
> You might want to write a very low scoring rule (score 0.01) that fires
> on 'List-id' headers for mailing lists you are subscribed to and use
> this in a meta rules to use different rules for mail from known mailing
> lists and everything else.
Thanks, but I decided to go a different route with this one, as Karsten
was right (it was too risky).