| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > spamassassin-users archives |
Re: Not passing checks (tests=[none])
From: Angel L. Mateo <amateo_at_nospam>Date: Fri Nov 26 2010 - 08:18:42 GMT
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
El 25/11/10 12:48, Tom Kinghorn escribió:
> On 2010/11/25 01:10 PM, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are running spamassassin (with postfix and amavisd-new) for a long
>> time.
>>
>> Since a time, I'm observing that I have a lot of messages with:
>>
> have you tried a debug?
>
> spamassassin -t -D < spam-message
>
> will produce a report similar to
>
> Content analysis details: (8.9 points, 6.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> 0.5 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
> [41.12.3.121 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
> 2.2 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
> 1.0 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
> 1.9 UPPERCASE_75_100 message body is 75-100% uppercase
> 0.1 SHORT_HELO_AND_INLINE_IMAGE Short HELO string, with inline image
> 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS
> 3.0 DOS_OE_TO_MX_IMAGE Direct to MX with OE headers and an image
>
>
Now I've done. This is an example for a message:
Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
_SUMMARY_
-- Angel L. Mateo Martínez Sección de Telemática Área de Tecnologías de la Información _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 868888337