|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > syslog-ng-users archives|
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:16 -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> What about catch_all?
> I thought there was some equivalence of - and _ respected in syslog-ng conf files.
yes, good catch. published a patch that adds this. again, still on 3.2
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:36:45AM +0200, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for your contribution, I've pushed this patch to the 3.2 version
> > that fixes the issue. (which is basically the same as you suggested):
> > commit da3c99f6d77b87edaa9bbc83814123a6f8895644
> > Author: Balazs Scheidler <email@example.com>
> > Date: Fri Apr 8 00:32:35 2011 +0200
> > Recognize both "catch-all" and "catchall" because of a documentation bug
> > The documentation referred to "catchall" whereas syslog-ng expected
> > "catch-all". Now accept both.
> > Reported-By: Mishou Michael <Michael.Mishou@csirc.irs.gov>
> > Signed-off-by: Balazs Scheidler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng
> Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng
> FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html
-- Bazsi ______________________________________________________________________________ Member info: https://lists.balabit.hu/mailman/listinfo/syslog-ng Documentation: http://www.balabit.com/support/documentation/?product=syslog-ng FAQ: http://www.campin.net/syslog-ng/faq.html