Re: [Wireshark-dev] pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop()

Hi,

Although Wireshark uses libpcap, these are libpcap questions, not
Wireshark questions.
You should post them to the right forum, which in this case is
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org.

Thanks,
Jaap

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:54:44 +0200, Selçuk Cevher <cevhers@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As far as I know, in general, pcap_loop() function of libpcap library is
> preferred over pcap_next_ex() function.
>
> Is it related to some kind of fact that pcap_loop() is more
> robust/reliable/efficient ?
>
> Thanks.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

• This message: [ Message body ]
• Next message: Jaap Keuter: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to add multiple packets in the main table"
• Previous message: Jaap Keuter: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] pcap_next_ex() crashes"
• In reply to: Selçuk Cevher: "[Wireshark-dev] pcap_next_ex() vs pcap_loop()"

• Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]