| Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives |
Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37112: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: reassemble.c
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws_at_nospam>Date: Fri May 13 2011 - 14:23:28 GMT
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Backing out I can do :-)
Anders Broman wrote:
> Hi,
> Lets back it out, Jakub may have a better solution :-)
> I'll do it later today/tomorrow if no one beats me to it.
> Regards
> Anders
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: den 13 maj 2011 16:12
> To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 37112: /trunk/epan/ /trunk/epan/: reassemble.c
>
> etxrab@wireshark.org wrote:
>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=37112
>>
>> User: etxrab
>> Date: 2011/05/12 10:19 PM
>>
>> Log:
>> We should get rid of g_mem_chunk_alloc() as it leaks memory
>> http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200910/msg00074.html
>> g_slice allocing the keys should make it possible to walk the
>> fragment table and free the fragments once they are g_slice_alloced.
>> It remains fo figure out how to do that.
>
> This is causing plenty of fuzz failures (see bug 5915).
>
> I'm out of time to look at it for now.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe