|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-dev archives|
I recently submitted the bug and patch:
I was wondering someone could take a look at it. The technique that I've used for reassembly doesn't seem to be the most orthodox (based on the reassembly done in other protocols, unlike most protocols SDH works in more of a column oriented way) and would really appreciate some feedback on it.
-- Andrew Kampjes Junior Software Developer - Endace email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> www.endace.com;<http://www.endace.com/> LinkedIn;<http://www.linkedin.com/companies/endace> follow us on Twitter<http://twitter.com/endace> power to see all This email (including any attachments) is intended to be read by the named recipient(s) only. If the email wasn't addressed to you, you mustn't use, distribute or copy any part of it. If you've received it in error please delete it (along with any attachments) and inform us of the error. Emails aren't secure and can't be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed. It's your responsibility to check this email and any attachments for viruses. These risks are deemed accepted by everyone that communicates with us by email.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <email@example.com>