Re: [Wireshark-dev] PATCH: btl2cap extended window shows wrong bit

From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko.news_at_nospam>
Date: Mon Aug 22 2011 - 08:14:01 GMT
To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>

Hi, I feel that opening bug for a simple patch is too much overhead.
Cannot this be managed like it is done in linux kernel?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Stephen Fisher
<steve@stephen-fisher.com> wrote:
> Please submit patches by opening a bug at https://bugs.wireshark.org/ so
> they don't get lost? Thanks.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-request@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: buildbot-no-reply_at_nospam: "[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-PowerPC"
Previous message: buildbot-no-reply_at_nospam: "[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86"
In reply to: Stephen Fisher: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] PATCH: btl2cap extended window shows wrong bit"
Next in thread: Jaap Keuter: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] PATCH: btl2cap extended window shows wrong bit"
Reply: Jaap Keuter: "Re: [Wireshark-dev] PATCH: btl2cap extended window shows wrong bit"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ]