|Main Archive Page > Month Archives > wireshark-users archives|
I avoid SVN. It's a personal issue...
Would this one below include the group permission change to dumpcap?
/*“ I am looking for a lot of men who have an infinite capacity to not know
what can't be done. ” -- Henry Ford */
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Jaap Keuter <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:09:57 +0200, Sake Blok <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On 28 aug 2010, at 04:30, kevin creason wrote:
> >> My problem is that files are saved as the user (root, wireshark, or me)
> and 600 permissions no matter what I do with umask, setgid, and setcap. I
> have not found the solution.
> >> I really would like to be able to have group permission so that the team
> can access them without requring dangerous root privilege.
> >> What's the magic bullet to accomplish this?
> > The file permissions are hardcoded in the source code. I have added
> > the option '-g' to dumpcap to enable group read access as this can
> > indeed be handy when (automatically) capturing to a ringbuffer.
> > To be able to use this feature, you will have to use an automated
> > build with a number higher than 33978 (available in a couple of
> > hours) or wait for the next 1.5.x development release.
> > Cheers,
> > Sake
> >  http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/
> I think you need to specify /trunk as well, since trunk-1.0, trunk-1.2
> and trunk-1.4 share the revision number space.
> Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <email@example.com>